Anonymous User
Login / Registration

Gastroenterologie
a hepatologie

Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Gastroent Hepatol 2024; 78(2): 165–169. doi: 10.48095/ccgh2024165.

Robotic pancreatic surgery in the Czech Republic – first experiences

Michael Rousek1, Pavel Záruba1, Radek Pohnán Orcid.org  1

+ Affiliation

Summary

Robotic surgery is experiencing considerable development across surgical disciplines worldwide. The increasing number of robotic centres, as well as the expansion of the spectrum of robotically assisted minimally invasive procedures contribute to the increase in the number of performed procedures. Compared to laparoscopy or open surgery, robotic surgery offers several advantages, while maintaining adequate safety and oncological radicality of the operations. Pancreatic surgery is currently a hot topic in robotic surgery worldwide. Czech Republic is also following this trend. Robotic surgery is gradually being introduced to established pancreatic centres. The Department of Surgery of the 2nd Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and the Central Military Hospital in Prague ranks among the pioneers of this industry. In this communication, we present a summary of our first experiences with robotic pancreatic surgery.

Keywords

robotic pancreatic surgery, miniinvazivní chirurgie, robotic surgery, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy, robotic distal pancreatectomy

To read this article in full, please register for free on this website.

Benefits for subscribers

Benefits for logged users

Literature

1. Kalan S, Chauhan S, Coelho RF et al. History of robotic surgery. J Robotic Surg 2010; 4(3): 141–147. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2.
2. George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A et al. Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care. JSLS 2018; 22(4): e2018.00039. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039.
3. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR et al. Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003; 13(1): 33–36. doi: 10.1089/109264203321235449.
4. Březina M, Loveček M, Klos D et al. První robotická resekce slinivky břišní v České republice. 2022 [online]. Dostupné z: https: //zezdravotnictvi.cz/zpravy/prvni-roboticka-resekce-slinivky-brisni-v-ceske-republice/.
5. Jaroščiaková S, Tvrdoň J, Hladík P et al. Robotická distální pankreatektomie − první zkušenosti. Rozhl Chir 2023; 102: 125–129. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.3.125–129.
6. Müller PC, Breuer E, Nickel F et al. Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes From 16 International Expert Centers. Ann Surg 2023; 278(2): 253–259. doi: 10.1097/SLA.000 0000000005601.
7. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269(1): 2–9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.00000 00000002979.
8. Korrel M, Jones LR, van Hilst J et al. Mini- mally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic cancer (DIPLOMA): an international randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 31: 100673. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100673.
9. Guerra F, Giuliani G, Bencini L et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117(7): 1509–1516. doi: 10.1002/jso.25026.
10. Kabir T, Tan HL, Syn NL et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies. Surgery 2022; 171(2): 476–489. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.020.
11. Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Palanivelu C et al. International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8(4): 345–360. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08.
12. Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG et al. The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updates Surg 2015; 67(3): 257–264. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0299-y.
13. Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM et al. Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e13000. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013000.
14. Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surg 2020; 271(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1097/SLA. 0000000000003590.
15. Jones LR, Zwart MJW, Molenaar IQ et al. Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Patient Selection, Volume Criteria, and Training Programs. Scand J Surg 2020; 109(1): 29–33. doi: 10.1177/1457496920911815.
16. Kirks RC, Lorimer PD, Fruscione M et al. Robotic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: Comparison of clinical outcomes and cost to the open approach. Int J Med Robot 2017; 13(3). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1832.
17. Nguyen TK, Zenati MS, Boone BA et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the presence of aberrant or anomalous hepatic arterial anatomy: safety and oncologic outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17(7): 594–599. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12414.
18. Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2016; 401(8): 1111–1122. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1499-8.
19. Nassour I, Tohme S, Hoehn R et al. Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc 2021; 35(5): 2248–2254. doi: 10.1007/s00 464-020-07638-w.

Credited self-teaching test